GOOGLE still going strong after the AI volatility breakout trade signals. New updated stop loss level to the 324 zone!
StarMine Review: Alphabet (GOOGL)
1. StarMine Factor Analysis (with Explanations)
🟢 Bullish / Supportive Factors
Analyst Revisions – 73
What it measures: Direction and magnitude of analysts’ estimate changes.
What it says here: Revisions are modestly positive, meaning expectations are inching higher but not aggressively. This supports stability rather than sharp upside.
Short Interest – 91
What it measures: How crowded the short side is.
What it says here: Very low short interest. The market is not positioned against Google, which reduces downside volatility.
Earnings Quality – 73
What it measures: Whether earnings are supported by cash flow (low accruals, sustainable margins).
What it says here: Google’s earnings are clean and repeatable. Growth is real, not accounting-driven.
Credit Risk – Combined: 98
What it measures: Overall probability of financial stress using balance sheet, ratios, and text analysis.
What it says here: Near-perfect score. Google has exceptional financial strength, massive liquidity, and minimal credit risk.
Credit Risk – Smart Ratios: 85
What it measures: Leverage, coverage ratios, and liquidity metrics.
What it says here: Balance sheet ratios are very strong, even after heavy AI and capex spending.
Credit Risk – Structural: 97
What it measures: Long-term capital structure sustainability.
What it says here: Google’s business model and capital structure are extremely resilient.
Credit Risk – Text Mining: 82
What it measures: Risk signals from earnings calls and filings.
What it says here: Management language shows confidence, stability, and no hidden stress signals.
🔴 Bearish / Constraining Factors
Intrinsic Valuation – 14
What it measures: Value versus modeled fair value.
What it says here: Google trades well above intrinsic estimates. Upside is not cheap.
Relative Valuation – 16
What it measures: Valuation versus industry peers.
What it says here: Google trades at a premium to its peer group across most metrics.
M&A Target Model – 1
What it measures: Likelihood of being acquired.
What it says here: Effectively zero. Google is far too large and strategically complex.
2. Valuation Snapshot: Premium, But Not Extreme for a Mega-Cap
Trailing 12-Month Valuation
-
P/E: 31.9 (industry ~0, distorted by losses)
-
EV/EBITDA: 22.8 vs 5.6
-
EV/Sales: 10.1 vs 2.6
-
P/CF: 26.1 vs 3.9
-
P/B: 10.6 vs 1.6
Forward (Next 12 Months)
-
Forward P/E: 30.2 vs industry 12.4
-
Forward EV/EBITDA: 18.7 vs 9.2
-
Forward EV/Sales: 8.8 vs 2.0
👉 Google trades at a clear premium, reflecting:
-
Durable cash flows
-
AI optionality
-
Platform dominance
But valuation also implies limited margin for disappointment.
3. Earnings & Estimates: High Visibility, Low Surprise
March 2026 Quarter
-
Mean EPS: 2.55
-
Smart EPS: 2.56
-
Predicted Surprise: +0.46%
FY December 2026
-
Mean EPS: 11.25
-
Smart EPS: 11.26
-
Predicted Surprise: +0.13%
Interpretation:
-
Smart Estimates ≈ Consensus
-
Earnings are well modeled
-
Large surprises (up or down) are unlikely
4. Integrated StarMine Interpretation
What StarMine is really saying about Google:
-
Financial risk is virtually nonexistent
-
Earnings quality is solid and repeatable
-
Market positioning is supportive (few shorts)
-
Valuation already reflects confidence in AI, Search, and Cloud
-
Returns are likely steady, not explosive
🎯 Bottom Line
Google is a high-quality, low-risk compounder rather than a factor-driven alpha play.
StarMine frames GOOGL as:
-
A core holding, not a tactical trade
-
Dependent on execution and macro stability
-
Vulnerable mainly to valuation compression, not earnings collapse



No comments:
Post a Comment